Awesome Computed Tomography
A curated list of CT reconstruction resources. Every paper link is resolved against Crossref, arXiv or the publisher’s own record, and every URL is rechecked weekly.
- Papers
- 678
- Toolkits
- 60
- Datasets
- 82
- Benchmarks
- 22
- Learning
- 35
- Updated
- 2026-10-30
CT Reconstruction Benchmarks & Challenges
22 CT reconstruction benchmarks and challenges (low-dose, sparse-view, limited-angle, metal artifacts and more), with year, tasks and what each one evaluates.
| Benchmark / Challenge | Year | Tasks | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generating synthetic computed tomography for radiotherapy: SynthRAD2025 challenge report [official] | 2026 | cbct, synthetic-ct, reconstruction | Synthetic CT generation from CBCT and MRI — the 2025 edition of SynthRAD, with the accompanying report documenting the tasks, data and results. Same CBCT-to-CT focus as the 2023 edition, where scatter, truncation and beam hardening dominate the input. |
| CT-DegradBench: A Physics-Informed Benchmark for CT Degradation Detection and Severity Estimation | 2026 | reconstruction | A physics-informed benchmark for detecting CT degradations (noise, blur, artefacts) and estimating their severity — it asks what is wrong with a scan, not only how to reconstruct it. Accepted at the CVPR 2026 VISION Workshop (DEXTER track). |
| DeepInverse benchmark suite [official] | 2024 | reconstruction, benchmarking | A unified PyTorch benchmark harness covering CT, MRI, deblurring and inpainting, with reproducible metrics and pretrained baselines — the most practical way to compare a new CT method against strong generic solvers. |
| AAPM CT-MAR Grand Challenge [official] | 2024 | metal-artifact, reconstruction | Metal artifact reduction on simulated CT (2023–24): 14,000 training cases with and without metal, image- or sinogram-domain methods allowed, ranked by a weighted set of clinically focused image-quality metrics. Results reported in Medical Physics (2025). |
| SynthRAD2023 Challenge [official] | 2023 | cbct, synthetic-ct, reconstruction | Synthetic CT generation from CBCT and MRI. Relevant here because the CBCT-to-CT task is exactly where reconstruction artefacts (scatter, truncation, beam hardening) dominate — the challenge forces methods to handle them rather than assume clean input. |
| LDCTIQAC 2023 [official] | 2023 | low-dose, quality-assessment | Low-dose CT perceptual image quality assessment: no-reference quality models scored on low-dose CT images with mixed noise and artefacts, ranked by how well they agree with radiologists' ratings. A test of the metrics reconstruction papers report, not of the reconstructions. |
| Helsinki Tomography Challenge [official] | 2022 | limited-angle, reconstruction | Real measured limited-angle sinograms. A purely learned network trained on synthetic data won; the only model-based entry (CIL, directional TV) placed third — evidence that classical methods stay competitive at limited angle. |
| AutoPET Challenge | 2022 | segmentation | Whole-body PET/CT lesion segmentation, run annually since 2022 (four editions by 2025), each with a deliberately hidden multi-centre test cohort. |
| CTooth / CTooth+ [official] | 2022 | segmentation, cbct | Fully annotated 3D dental CBCT dataset and benchmark for tooth segmentation (5,803 CBCT slices), later extended to CTooth+. A small but well-annotated CBCT benchmark in a domain where artefacts are severe. |
| AAPM DL-Spectral CT Challenge [official] | 2022 | spectral, reconstruction | Reconstruct adipose, fibroglandular and calcification maps directly from simulated dual-kVp breast CT data: 1,000 training cases and a 100-case test set. The spectral counterpart of the DL-Sparse-View challenge. |
| AAPM DL-Sparse-View CT Challenge [official] | 2021 | sparse-view, reconstruction | Recover a 2D breast-CT phantom from ideal noiseless 128-view fan-beam data: 4,000 training pairs, 100 test cases, ranked by RMSE on a public leaderboard. A common reference point for deep-learning sparse-view CT. |
| LoDoPaB-CT benchmark [official] | 2021 | low-dose, reconstruction | Grand-challenge style evaluation on the LoDoPaB-CT split, with a published, tuned FBP+U-Net reference baseline so improvements are measurable. |
| MICCAI FLARE | 2021 | segmentation | Multi-organ abdominal CT segmentation across four editions (FLARE21/22/23/24); the standard downstream-robustness target for CT reconstruction outputs. |
| HECKTOR Challenge | 2020 | segmentation, prognosis | Head-and-neck PET/CT tumour delineation; five editions make it one of the longer-running medical imaging challenges. |
| KiTS Challenge | 2019 | segmentation | Kidney tumour segmentation, three editions (2019/2021/2023) with strictly controlled annotation quality and a strong emphasis on cross-institution generalisation. |
| VerSe Challenge | 2019 | segmentation | Vertebra labelling and segmentation on multi-detector CT, run in two editions with MICCAI 2019 and 2020 (374 scans, 355 patients); the hidden test set is what makes results comparable. |
| CHAOS Challenge | 2019 | segmentation | Abdominal CT and MRI organ segmentation with explicit cross-modality evaluation; the CT scans are portal-venous-phase contrast-enhanced, not low-dose. |
| SPARE Challenge [official] | 2018 | dynamic, cbct, reconstruction | Thoracic 4D cone-beam CT reconstruction from a one-minute scan. The first widely adopted benchmark for breathing-resolved dynamic CBCT; run by the Image X Institute at the University of Sydney. |
| Medical Segmentation Decathlon | 2018 | segmentation | Ten tasks with a fixed, hidden test set and a strict rule that no task-specific tuning is allowed — a genuinely fair generalisation benchmark. |
| Noise2Noise denoising protocol [official] | 2018 | denoising, self-supervised | The reference implementation that popularised training a denoiser without clean targets. On CT it became the standard 'no clean ground truth' evaluation protocol — most unsupervised CT denoising papers report on a Mayo-LDCT-style split under this setting. |
| AAPM Low-Dose CT Grand Challenge [official] | 2016 | low-dose, denoising, reconstruction | The 2016 AAPM–NIBIB–Mayo Clinic challenge: 30 contrast-enhanced abdominal CT cases (10 for training, 20 for testing), with quarter-dose (25 %) data simulated by inserting Poisson noise into the projections. Its cases and protocol are the basis of the Mayo low-dose data that most low-dose CT papers still report on. |
| SPIE-AAPM-NCI LungX Challenge [official] | 2015 | diagnosis, low-dose | Lung nodule malignancy classification on low-dose screening CT — the task is diagnostic and benchmarked against radiologists, not nodule detection. 70 cases (10 training, 60 test), distributed through TCIA. |